Quality and cost outcomes of an integrated supportive care program

7Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: This article reports findings from a demonstration project funded by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI). The purpose of the project was to test a supportive care program on the outcomes of quality of care and quality of life, and costs in patients with advanced cancer. Methods: The project was conducted between February 2015 and February 2018, enrolling adult, Medicare or Medicaid beneficiaries with advanced or progressed solid tumor malignancy. A comparative longitudinal comparison of the program with both a concurrent control and an historic control was used to evaluate outcomes. The intervention included routine electronic biopsychosocial screening, early access to specialty palliative care, and nurse care coordination. Quality of life, aggressiveness of care, and healthcare utilization were measured. Results: A total of 1340 people were enrolled, with 71% of the total sample being Caucasian; 41.4% had stage IV cancer, and 20% utilized Medicaid only. Significant differences in the enrolled patients and the comparison group were controlled for through statistical analysis. There were significantly fewer ED visits, unplanned admissions, and fewer total hospitalization days in the intervention group. In the last 30 days of life, hospital and ICU admissions were less and a greater proportion of patients were enrolled in hospice in the intervention group. Quality of life had a marked improvement for enrolled patients. Average cost per member per month was not less in the enrolled group. Conclusion: This pragmatic demonstration project confirmed the clinical benefits of an integration of supportive care for patients with advanced cancer, although no reduction in costs was found.

References Powered by Scopus

Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

5898Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of a palliative care intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer: The project ENABLE II randomized controlled trial

1437Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life: Is it a quality-of-care issue?

793Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Impact of a Biopsychosocial Screening Program on Clinical and Hospital-Based Outcomes in Cancer

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ovarian Cancer Symptom Clusters: Use of the NIH Symptom Science Model for Precision in Symptom Recognition and Management

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Developing a Collaborative Agenda-Setting Intervention (CASI) to promote patient-centered communication in ovarian cancer care: A design thinking approach

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weinstein, E., Kemmann, M., Douglas, S. L., Daly, B., & Levitan, N. (2022). Quality and cost outcomes of an integrated supportive care program. Supportive Care in Cancer, 30(1), 535–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06450-z

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

45%

Researcher 4

36%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 5

56%

Chemistry 2

22%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

11%

Computer Science 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free