The concluding stage: The concluding rule

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the following tirade from the Dutch feminist author and politician Anja Meulenbelt a fallacious train of thought is exposed. In her reaction to comments from Hein Roethof, who was in the 1980 s a member of Dutch parliament for the PvdA (Dutch labor party) of the Lower House and – as spokesman for judicial matters – had branded the actions of the feminists against pornography as “self-appointed moral censorship,” Anja Meulenbelt accused him of committing the argumentum ad ignorantiam fallacy, without actually using this term in so many words:.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2009). The concluding stage: The concluding rule. In Argumentation Library (Vol. 16, pp. 193–201). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2614-9_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free