In the following tirade from the Dutch feminist author and politician Anja Meulenbelt a fallacious train of thought is exposed. In her reaction to comments from Hein Roethof, who was in the 1980 s a member of Dutch parliament for the PvdA (Dutch labor party) of the Lower House and – as spokesman for judicial matters – had branded the actions of the feminists against pornography as “self-appointed moral censorship,” Anja Meulenbelt accused him of committing the argumentum ad ignorantiam fallacy, without actually using this term in so many words:.
CITATION STYLE
van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2009). The concluding stage: The concluding rule. In Argumentation Library (Vol. 16, pp. 193–201). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2614-9_8
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.