Effects of 15-Days −6° Head-Down Bed Rest on the Attention Bias of Threatening Stimulus

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Previous researchers have found that head-down bed rest (HDBR) will affect the emotional state of individuals, and negative emotions such as anxiety are closely related to attention bias. The present study adopted the dot-probe task to evaluate the effects of 15-days of −6° HDBR on the attention bias of threatening stimulus in 17 young men, which was completed before (Pre-HDBR), during (HDBR-1, HDBR-8, HDBR-15), after (Post-HDBR) the bed rest. In addition, self-report inventories (State Anxiety Inventory, SAI; Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale, PANAS) were conducted to record emotional changes. The results showed that the participants’ negative affect scores on HDBR-8 were significantly lower than the HDBR-1 in PANAS while there was no significant difference on positive affect scores and anxiety scores in SAI. And the results showed that at the Pre-HDBR, HDBT-1, HDBR-15, Post-HDBR, the response speed to threatening stimulus was faster than neutral stimulus, but no statistical significance. However, reaction time of threatening stimulus is significantly longer than neutral stimulus in the HDBR-8, indicating that HDBR may have an effect on the participants’ attention bias, and this effect is manifested as attention avoidance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jiang, S., Qian, Y. M., Jiang, Y., Cao, Z. Q., Xin, B. M., Wang, Y. C., & Wu, B. (2022). Effects of 15-Days −6° Head-Down Bed Rest on the Attention Bias of Threatening Stimulus. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.730820

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free