Investigating algorithmic stock market trading using ensemble machine learning methods

13Citations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Recent advances in the machine learning field have given rise to efficient ensemble methods that accurately forecast time-series. In this paper, we use the Quantopian algorithmic stock market trading simulator to assess ensemble methods performance in daily prediction and trading. The ensemble methods used are Extremely Randomized Trees, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting. All methods are trained using multiple technical indicators and automatic stock selection is used. Simulation results show significant returns relative to the benchmark and large values of alpha are produced from all methods. These results strengthen the role of ensemble method based machine learning in automated stock market trading.

References Powered by Scopus

Random forests

96706Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine

20343Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Extremely randomized trees

6185Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Trends and directions of financial technology (Fintech) in society and environment: A bibliometric study

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms to build a predictive model for detecting diabetes complications

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stock market prediction with gaussian naïve bayes machine learning algorithm

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saifan, R., Sharif, K., Abu-Ghazaleh, M., & Abdel-Majeed, M. (2020). Investigating algorithmic stock market trading using ensemble machine learning methods. Informatica (Slovenia), 44(3), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.31449/INF.V44I3.2904

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

57%

Lecturer / Post doc 8

22%

Researcher 5

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 15

50%

Business, Management and Accounting 8

27%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5

17%

Decision Sciences 2

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 4

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0