Inquisitor, evaluator or facilitator? teachers’ use of instructional format during naturally occurring comprehension strategies instruction

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Comprehension instruction, or the lack of it, has been given considerable attention by reading researchers, policy makers, and teacher educators during the last 30 years (Pearson 2009). Researchers have made significant progress in identifying and addressing several important components and processes involved in skilled text comprehension, with active and flexible strategic processing described as a hallmark of expert reading within an academic domain (Pressley and Afflerbach 1995; Strømsø et al. 2003). Thus, a substantial amount of research effort has been put into instructional research, making it possible to give research-based recommendations on what comprehension instruction should look like in the classroom (Dewitz et al. 2009). Because the majority of the instructional research is conducted in elementary and middle-grade classrooms, less is known about comprehension instruction, particularly about instruction in comprehension strategies, as it is regularly offered adolescents in secondary schools (Conley 2009).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anmarkrud, Ø. (2016). Inquisitor, evaluator or facilitator? teachers’ use of instructional format during naturally occurring comprehension strategies instruction. In Teaching and Learning in Lower Secondary Schools in the Era of PISA and TIMSS (pp. 33–45). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17302-3_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free