Nonablative and minimally ablative resurfacing

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Skin damage, resulting from surgery, trauma, acne scarring, or excessive skin exposure, often prompts patients to seek medical advice. Nowadays, even expected signs of aging, such as rhytides and “age spots,” can be distressing enough to lead patients to inquire about treatment. Traditional treatment modalities include the use of topical retinoids, bleaching agents, chemical peels, microdermabrasion, and lasers. With the recent advances in technology, lasers and light sources have now become the technique of choice for skin resurfacing. Conventional lasers, like the carbon dioxide (CO2) or erbium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG), are ablative and thus remove the entire epidermis and portions of the dermis during treatment. Consequently, results are impressive, but there is a great degree of associated postoperative morbidity. Patients are often advised to expect 1–2 weeks of “downtime” in order to recover from the swelling, oozing, crusting, and discomfort that results from the procedure [1] (V/B).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Desai, S., & Bhatia, A. C. (2012). Nonablative and minimally ablative resurfacing. In Evidence-Based Procedural Dermatology (pp. 271–286). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09424-3_15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free