Assessing the accuracy of self-reported data: An evaluation of the toxics release inventory

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Self-reported regulatory data are hard to verify. This article compares air emissions reported by plants in the Toxics Release Inventory with chemical concentration levels measured by EPA pollution monitors. We find that the large drops in air emissions reported by firms in the TRI are not always matched by similar reductions in measured concentrations from EPA monitors. When the first digits of the monitored chemical concentrations follow a monotonically decreasing distribution, we expect (via Benford's Law) a similar distribution of first digits for the TRI data. For lead and nitric acid the self-reported data do not follow the expected first digit pattern. This suggests that for these two heavily regulated chemicals plants are not reporting accurate estimates of their air emissions. © Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marchi, S. D., & Hamilton, J. T. (2006). Assessing the accuracy of self-reported data: An evaluation of the toxics release inventory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 32(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-006-6666-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free