Low-dose sufentanil and lidocaine supplementation of general anaesthesia

5Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This randomized double-blind study compared the effects of: (1) saline infusion (C); (2) sufentanil alone (1.0 μg · kg-1) (S); and (3) low-dose sufentanil (0.5μg · kg-1) in combination with lidocaine (1.5 mg · kg-1) (LS); on the cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation and on postoperative ventilation as monitored by respiratory inductive plethysmography in day-care surgical procedures of approximately 60 min duration. Thirty healthy, unpremedicated patients were studied. Thiopentone requirements were reduced by 40 and 28 per cent in the S and LS groups respectively compared with control (P < 0.001). Both treatments suppressed HR and BP responses (P < 0.005) to intubation. Postoperatively, PaCO2 was elevated (P < 0.05) in group S. Dose-related respiratory depression was observed. The incidence of postoperative apnoea was significantly higher in both S and LS groups than compared with control (P <0.05). However, only patients in group S showed higher apnoea index and mean apnoea duration over the initial 10-20 min after surgery compared with control (P < 0.005). In addition, group S showed slower respiratory frequency and prolonged expiratory time (P < 0.005). In conclusion, an induction dose of sufentanil (I μg · kg-1) used in balanced anaesthesia of less than 70 min duration was associated with significant respiratory depression, particularly during the initial 10-20 min after surgery, whereas low-dose sufentanil (0.5 μg· kg-1) with lidocaine (1.5 mg · kg-1) had minimal postoperative respiratory depression and comparable attenuation ofpressor responses to intubation. © 1990 Canadian Anesthesiologists.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cheng, D. C. H., Chung, F., Chapman, K. R., & Romanelli, J. (1990). Low-dose sufentanil and lidocaine supplementation of general anaesthesia. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 37(5), 521–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03006319

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free