Efficacy of mouth rinses and toothpaste on tooth whitening

75Citations
Citations of this article
134Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: People increasingly desire tooth whitening. Considering the wide range of whitening products on the market, this study evaluated the efficacy of whitening toothpastes and mouth rinses compared with the 10% carbamide peroxide (CP) whitening gel. Methods: We obtained 120 cylindrical specimens from bovine teeth, which were darkened for 24 hours in a coffee solution. The color measurement was performed by a spectrophotometer using the C1E L*a*b* system, and specimens were divided into six groups according to the use of the following agents: group 1, conventional fluoridated toothpaste; group 2, Close Up White Now; group 3, Lister- ine Whitening; group 4, Colgate Plax Whitening; group 5, experimental mouth rinse with Plasdone; and group 6, l(Y/( CP Whiteness Perfect. After the simulation of 12 weeks of treatment for groups 1 to 5 and 14 days of treatment for group 6, the specimens were subjected to a new color reading. Results: Data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ot=0.05), which showed significant differences among groups after 12 weeks for \E (p=0.0()l). Results of the Tukey test revealed that groups 3, 4, and 6 presented significantly higher color alteration than groups 1, 2, and 5. Conclusions: The whitening toothpaste Close Up White Now and the experimental mouth rinse with Plasdone showed similar color alteration as conventional toothpaste after a 12- week treatment simulation. These groups presented significantly lower color alteration compared with whitening mouth rinses Lister- ine and Colgate Plax Whitening, which showed similar results to those observed after 14 days of bleaching with 10% CP treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Torres, C. R. G., Perote, L. C. C. C., Gutierrez, N. C., Pucci, C. R., & Borges, A. B. (2013). Efficacy of mouth rinses and toothpaste on tooth whitening. Operative Dentistry, 38(1), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-360-L

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free