The development of a tongue assessment tool to assist with tongue-tie identification

74Citations
Citations of this article
320Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim To produce a simple tool with good transferability to provide a consistent assessment of tongue appearance and function in infants with tongue-tie. Methods The Bristol Tongue Assessment Tool (BTAT) was developed based on clinical practice and with reference to the Hazelbaker Assessment Tool for Lingual Frenulum Function (ATLFF). This paper documents 224 tongue assessments using the BTAT. There were 126 tongue assessments recorded using the BTAT and ATLFF tools to facilitate comparisons between them. Paired BTAT assessments were obtained from eight midwives who were using the new assessment tool. Results There was acceptable internal reliability for the four-item BTAT (Cronbach's α=0.708) and the eight midwives who used it showed good correlation in the consistency of its use (ICC=0.760). The BTAT showed a strong and significant correlation (0.89) with the ATLFF, indicating that the simpler BTAT could be used in place of the more detailed assessment tool to score the extent of a tongue-tie. Midwives found it quick and easy to use and felt that it would be easy to teach to others. Conclusions The BTAT provides an objective, clear and simple measure of the severity of a tongue-tie, to inform selection of infants for frenotomy and to monitor the effect of the procedure.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Clinical Consensus Statement: Ankyloglossia in Children

117Citations
404Readers

This article is free to access.

87Citations
240Readers
Get full text
45Citations
94Readers

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ingram, J., Johnson, D., Copeland, M., Churchill, C., Taylor, H., & Emond, A. (2015). The development of a tongue assessment tool to assist with tongue-tie identification. Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 100(4), F344–F348. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-307503

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 97

69%

Researcher 23

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 12

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 9

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 114

65%

Nursing and Health Professions 45

26%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9

5%

Social Sciences 7

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 83

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0