A Bayesian technique for conditioning radar precipitation estimates to rain-gauge measurements

130Citations
Citations of this article
118Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The paper introduces a new technique based upon the use of block-Kriging and of Kalman filtering to combine, optimally in a Bayesian sense, areal precipitation fields estimated from meteorological radar to point measurements of precipitation such as are provided by a network of rain-gauges. The theoretical development is followed by a numerical example, in which an error field with a large bias and a noise to signal ratio of 30% is added to a known random field, to demonstrate the potentiality of the proposed algorithm. The results analysed on a sample of 1000 realisations, show that the final estimates are totally unbiased and the noise variance reduced substantially. Moreover, a case study on the upper Reno river in Italy demonstrates the improvements in rainfall spatial distribution obtainable by means of the proposed radar conditioning technique.

References Powered by Scopus

A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems

23081Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

New results in linear filtering and prediction theory

4426Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A bayesian analysis of kriging

420Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

MSWEP: 3-hourly 0.25° global gridded precipitation (1979-2015) by merging gauge, satellite, and reanalysis data

796Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multi-sensor data fusion: An introduction

352Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluation of radar-gauge merging methods for quantitative precipitation estimates

252Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Todini, E. (2001). A Bayesian technique for conditioning radar precipitation estimates to rain-gauge measurements. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 5(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-5-187-2001

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 52

54%

Researcher 37

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

4%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 36

41%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 26

30%

Environmental Science 21

24%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free