Standing on the shoulders of giants - Production concepts versus production applicationsthe Hitachi Tool Engineering example

42Citations
Citations of this article
109Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article analyzes the methodologies of Henry Ford, Taiichi Ohno, and Eliyahu Goldratt and presents explicitly the four principles of flow management according to these operations management philosophies. The differences among them are related to different instances of the same principles in different environments: Ford in his industry focusing on mass production of few (or one) products, Ohno at Toyota with the Toyota production System (TPS), and Goldratt in a wide range of production environments. The concepts are illustrated and tested in a practical case of implementation in the Hitachi Tool Engineering company. Here, we have the classic case of an unlikely successful attempt to implement a methodology (Lean), and how the Theory of Constraints (TOC) solved this issue. Finally, the limits for the solution proposed by Goldratt for operations management (DBR) are described.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goldratt, E. M. (2009). Standing on the shoulders of giants - Production concepts versus production applicationsthe Hitachi Tool Engineering example. Gestao e Producao, 16(3), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-530X2009000300002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free