Abstract
Case-based reasoning systems routinely record the results of prior problem-solving, but not the provenance of new cases: the way in which the new cases were derived. This paper proposes the value of tracking provenance information in CBR, especially when timely feedback may not be available. It illustrates the use of provenance information with studies of the application of provenance information to guide case-base maintenance. Experiments with two data sets illustrate the benefit of using provenance to propagate maintenance and to target maintenance effort. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Leake, D., & Whitehead, M. (2007). Case provenance: The value of remembering case sources. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4626 LNAI, pp. 194–208). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74141-1_14
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
