Study design:A systematic review. Objective:To critically review quality of life (QOL) instruments used with spinal cord injury (SCI) populations. Setting:Vancouver, Canada. Methods:A systematic literature review was conducted for publications assessing the measurement properties of QOL outcome measures. Pre-established criteria were used to evaluate the measurement properties. Results:Fourteen articles reporting on 13 QOL instruments met the inclusion criteria, including the Patient Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure (PRISM), Quality of Well-being Scale, Qualiveen, Sickness Impact Profile (SIP68), Short Form (SF)-36, SF-36V, SF-12, SF-6D, Quality of Life Index, Quality of Life Profile for Adults with Physical Disabilities (QOLP-PD), Satisfaction with Life Scale, Sense of Well-being Index (SWBI), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF scale (WHOQOL-BREF). The SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF have been widely used and validated. The SIP68, QOLP-PD, SF-36V, and SWBI are promising with limited investigation. The Qualiveen and PRISM performed well and are specific to SCI complications. Conclusion:The WHOQOL-BREF is presently the most acceptable and established instrument to assess QOL after SCI. The SIP68, QOLP-PD, SF-36V, and SWBI are promising; however, require further evaluation of their measurement properties. © 2010 International Spinal Cord Society All rights reserved.
CITATION STYLE
Hill, M. R., Noonan, V. K., Sakakibara, B. M., & Miller, W. C. (2010, June). Quality of life instruments and definitions in individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Spinal Cord. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2009.164
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.