Robust Computerized Adaptive Testing

8Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In order to optimize measurement precision in computerized adaptive testing (CAT), items are often selected based on the amount of information they provide about a candidate. The amount of information is calculated using item- and person parameters that have been estimated. Usually, uncertainty in these estimates is not taken into account in the item selection process. Maximizing Fisher information, for example, tends to favor items with positive estimation errors in the discrimination parameter and negative estimation errors in the guessing parameter. This is also referred to as capitalization on chance in adaptive testing. Not taking the uncertainty into account might be a serious threat to both the validity and viability of computerized adaptive testing. Previous research on linear test forms showed quite an effect on the precision of the resulting ability estimates. In this chapter, robust test assembly is presented as an alternative method that accounts for uncertainty in the item parameters in CAT assembly. In a simulation study, the effects of robust test assembly are shown. The impact turned out to be smaller than expected. Some theoretical considerations are shared. Finally, the implications are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Veldkamp, B. P., & Verschoor, A. J. (2019). Robust Computerized Adaptive Testing. In Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment (pp. 291–305). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18480-3_15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free