Mistrustful and Misunderstood: a Review of Paranoid Personality Disorder

32Citations
Citations of this article
199Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Paranoid personality disorder (PPD) has historically been neglected by science out of proportion to its prevalence or its association with negative clinical outcomes. This review provides an update on what is known about PPD regarding its prevalence, demographics, comorbidity, biological mechanism, risk factors, and relationship to psychotic disorders. Recent Findings: PPD has long been the subject of a rich and prescient theoretical literature which has provided a surprisingly coherent account of the psychological mechanism of non-delusional paranoia. Available data indicate that PPD has a close relationship with childhood trauma and social stress. Descriptive data on a sample of 115 individuals with paranoid personality disorder is examined in comparison with a group of individuals with borderline personality disorder. The descriptive data largely confirm previously identified relationships between paranoid personality disorder and childhood trauma, violence, and race. We identify important similarities to and differences from borderline personality disorder. Summary: PPD continues to be an important construct in the clinic and the laboratory. Available data lead to a reconsideration of the disorder as more closely related to trauma than to schizophrenia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, R. J. (2017, June 1). Mistrustful and Misunderstood: a Review of Paranoid Personality Disorder. Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40473-017-0116-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free