Comparing wave heights simulated in the Black Sea by the SWAN model with satellite data and direct wave measurements

30Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The results of wave simulation in the Black Sea using the SWAN spectral wave model and wind forcing data from the NCEP/CFSR reanalyze are presented in this paper. The calculations were done using the special unstructured mesh with spatial resolution of 10 km in the open sea and 200 m in the Tsemes Bay. The assessment of the wave simulation accuracy was performed on the basis of the satellite altimetry data and direct wave measurements in the shallow water. When comparing the calculated significant wave height with observational data the correlation equaled 0.8, while the root mean square error equaled 0.3. The comparison of simulation results and satellite data also showed good correlation.

References Powered by Scopus

A third-generation wave model for coastal regions 1. Model description and validation

3870Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The NCEP climate forecast system version 2

2668Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Computation of wind-wave spectra in coastal waters with SWAN on unstructured grids

269Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The wave and wind power potential in the western Black Sea

61Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quality of the ERA5 and CFSR winds and their contribution to wave modelling performance in a semi-closed sea

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Spatial calibration of an unstructured SWAN model forced with CFSR and ERA5 winds for the Black and Azov Seas

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Myslenkov, S., & Chernyshova, A. (2016). Comparing wave heights simulated in the Black Sea by the SWAN model with satellite data and direct wave measurements. Russian Journal of Earth Sciences, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.2205/2016ES000579

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 4

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 4

44%

Engineering 3

33%

Energy 1

11%

Environmental Science 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free