De-implementation strategy to Reduce the Inappropriate use of urinary and intravenous CATheters: Study protocol for the RICAT-study

11Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Urinary and (peripheral and central) intravenous catheters are widely used in hospitalized patients. However, up to 56% of the catheters do not have an appropriate indication and some serious complications with the use of these catheters can occur. The main objective of our quality improvement project is to reduce the use of catheters without an appropriate indication by 25-50%, and to evaluate the affecting factors of our de-implementation strategy. Methods: In a multicenter, prospective interrupted time series analysis, several interventions to avoid inappropriate use of catheters will be conducted in seven hospitals in the Netherlands. Firstly, we will define a list of appropriate indications for urinary and (peripheral and central) intravenous catheters, which will restrict the use of catheters and urge catheter removal when the indication is no longer appropriate. Secondly, after the baseline measurements, the intervention will take place, which consists of a kick-off meeting, including a competitive feedback report of the baseline measurements, and education of healthcare workers and patients. Additional strategies based on the baseline data and local conditions are optional. The primary endpoint is the percentage of catheters with an inappropriate indication on the day of data collection before and after the de-implementation strategy. Secondary endpoints are catheter-related infections or other complications, catheter re-insertion rate, length of hospital (and ICU) stay and mortality. In addition, the cost-effectiveness of the de-implementation strategy will be calculated. Discussion: This study aims to reduce the use of urinary and intravenous catheters with an inappropriate indication, and as a result reduce the catheter-related complications. If (cost-) effective it provides a tool for a nationwide approach to reduce catheter-related infections and other complications. Trial registration: Dutch trial registry: NTR6015. Registered 9 August 2016.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

De-implementation: A concept analysis

51Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

De-implementation strategy to reduce inappropriate use of intravenous and urinary catheters (RICAT): a multicentre, prospective, interrupted time-series and before and after study

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

De-implementation of tradition-based practices in critical care: A qualitative study

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Laan, B. J., Spijkerman, I. J. B., Godfried, M. H., Pasmooij, B. C., Maaskant, J. M., Borgert, M. J., … Geerlings, S. E. (2017). De-implementation strategy to Reduce the Inappropriate use of urinary and intravenous CATheters: Study protocol for the RICAT-study. BMC Infectious Diseases, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-2154-2

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

53%

Researcher 15

38%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

8%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 24

51%

Medicine and Dentistry 18

38%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

6%

Social Sciences 2

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free