Evaluation of mitral regurgitation: How much quantification do we need?

Abstract

Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Thus, the correct evaluation of the underlying etiology, pathomechanism and severity is crucial for optimal treatment. Echocardiography is the predominant diagnostic modality in the clinical routine as it enables grading of mitral regurgitation, which can frequently be achieved by readily available qualitative parameters. Additionally, echocardiography provides several methods to quantify the hemodynamic significance of MR. The effective regurgitation orifice area (EROA) is the quantitative parameter best correlated with clinical events. American and European imaging guidelines both recommend the use of quantitative parameters even though they disagree on the cut-off values for secondary MR. The evaluation of MR should always include an assessment of the adjacent heart chambers in order to be able to assess the impact of volume overload on size and function of the left ventricle and left atrium. The final interpretation of the quantitative parameters requires knowledge of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction. Newer 3D-echocardiographic approaches to quantify MR are less dependent on mathematical assumptions and have shown convincing results in several studies but still lack sufficient clinical validation. As an alternative to echocardiography, for specific indications cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has proven to be a systematic and observer-independent method for quantification of MR.