Constructing a longitudinal database of targeted regulation of abortion providers laws

11Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To build a longitudinal state-level database on targeted regulation of abortion providers (TRAP) laws. Data Sources: Primary sources included state websites, Lexis Nexis Quicklaw, and WestlawNext. We used a range of secondary sources to pinpoint policy timing. Study Design: This was a state-level review of TRAP shifts from 1973 to present. Data Collection: We captured data on TRAP policy activity and timing, focusing specifically on ambulatory surgical center (ASC) laws, admitting privilege requirements, and transfer agreements. Principal Findings: Twenty-five states had ever enacted an ASC, admitting privilege, or transfer agreement law. Many currently face legal challenges. Conclusions: Targeted regulation of abortion providers laws are favored by many states as a way to regulate abortion provision. These data can be used to better understand the impact of these laws.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Austin, N., & Harper, S. (2019). Constructing a longitudinal database of targeted regulation of abortion providers laws. Health Services Research, 54(5), 1084–1089. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13185

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free