The validity of the assignment book-based structured interview in predicting academic performance in medical schools: A retrospective cohort study

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: Structured interviews have become essential in the medical schools admission selection because structured interviews predict academic achievement after admission. The purpose of this study was to determine validity and fairness of the new structural interview technique, assignment book-based structured interview (ABSI), in predicting future academic achievement of the medical students. Methods: The validity of this new interview technique and academic achievement was evaluated based on the data of all the applicants and successful applicants who applied for on-time admission between the year 2011 and 2014. Results: The ABSI technique showed a significant correlation and predictive validity for academic achievement in the medical school. The retention group received significantly lower T-scores of ABSI compared with the superior student group. Conclusion: The results indicate that ABSI is a feasible, reliable, fair and valid admission selection tool. The ABSI may be meaningful and fair method for predicting academic achievements, and it could be incorporated as one of the contents in the multiple mini-interview.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, H. J., Ryu, S. W., Won, J. Y., & Park, H. W. (2022). The validity of the assignment book-based structured interview in predicting academic performance in medical schools: A retrospective cohort study. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 34(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2022.221

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free