Reduction of hypotensive side effects during online-haemodiafiltration and low temperature haemodialysis

133Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. This study compares the effect of online-haemodiafiltration (o-HDF, post-dilution mode) with conventional haemodialysis (HD) and 'temperature-controlled' HD (Temp-HD) on the haemodynamic stability of hypotension-prone patients. Methods. Seventeen patients with a history of frequent hypotensive episodes during dialysis sessions were studied, each patient serving as his or her own control. The first 25 HD treatments in comparison with 25 o-HDF sessions were evaluated using identical dialysate temperature. In the second part of the study, o-HDF (n = 25) was compared with Temp-HD (n = 25). In the latter method, the temperature of the dialysate was adjusted to result in identical energy transfer rates to those in the corresponding o-HDF. The number of hypotensive episodes, blood temperature and blood volume regulation were assessed. Results. Symptomatic hypotension was much more frequent during HD (40%) than during o-HDF (4%) (P < 0.001). During o-HDF, an enhanced energy loss within the extracorporeal system occurred (o-HDF, 16.6 ± 4.0 W; HD, 5.4 ± 5.1 W; P < 0.0001), despite identical temperature settings for dialysate and substitution fluid. As a result, the blood returning to the patient was cooler during o-HDF than during HD (o-HDF 35 ± 0.2°C vs HD 36.5 ± 0.3°C; P < 0.0001). In o-HDF, even in the patients' circulation, the mean blood temperature was lower (o-HDF 36.7 ± 0.2°C vs HD 36.9 ± 0.3°C; P < 0.0001) and blood volume was significantly more reduced (o-HDF, 91.8 ± 3.1%; HD, 94.0 ± 3.2%; P < 0.05). Energy transfer rates and blood temperature did not differ significantly between o-HDF and Temp-HD. The rate of hypotensive episodes was low and not different between o-HDF (4%) and Temp-HD (4%). Neither was there any significant difference in blood volume reduction. Conclusions. O-HDF showed a significant reduction of hypotensive episodes compared with HD. Surprisingly, o-HDF resulted in cooling of the blood via enhanced thermal energy losses within the extracorporeal system, despite use of replacement fluid prepared from pre-warmed dialysate. The incidence of symptomatic hypotension was reduced to that of o-HDF by using cooler Temp-HD. Thus, unexpected blood cooling appears to be the main blood pressure-stabilizing factor in o-HDF.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Donauer, J., Schweiger, C., Rumberger, B., Krumme, B., & Böhler, J. (2003). Reduction of hypotensive side effects during online-haemodiafiltration and low temperature haemodialysis. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 18(8), 1616–1622. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfg206

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free