Technological Challenges and Solutions in Emergency Remote Teaching for Nursing: An International Cross-Sectional Survey

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: With the sudden global shift to online learning modalities, this study aimed to understand the unique challenges and experiences of emergency remote teaching (ERT) in nursing education. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive online international cross-sectional survey to capture the current state and firsthand experiences of ERT in the nursing discipline. Our analytical methods included a combination of traditional statistical analysis, advanced natural language processing techniques, latent Dirichlet allocation using Python, and a thorough qualitative assessment of feedback from open-ended questions. Results: We received responses from 328 nursing educators from 18 different countries. The data revealed generally positive satisfaction levels, strong technological self-efficacy, and significant support from their institutions. Notably, the characteristics of professors, such as age (p = 0.02) and position (p = 0.03), influenced satisfaction levels. The ERT experience varied significantly by country, as evidenced by satisfaction (p = 0.05), delivery (p = 0.001), teacher-student interaction (p = 0.04), and willingness to use ERT in the future (p = 0.04). However, concerns were raised about the depth of content, the transition to online delivery, teacher-student interaction, and the technology gap. Conclusions: Our findings can help advance nursing education. Nevertheless, collaborative efforts from all stakeholders are essential to address current challenges, achieve digital equity, and develop a standardized curriculum for nursing education.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jeon, E., Peltonen, L. M., Block, L. J., Ronquillo, C., Tayaben, J. L., Nibber, R., … Lee, J. (2024). Technological Challenges and Solutions in Emergency Remote Teaching for Nursing: An International Cross-Sectional Survey. Healthcare Informatics Research, 30(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2024.30.1.49

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free