Nonionic Surfactants in Photometric Determination of Trace Metals

  • Watanabe H
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The usual explanation offered for solubilization leads to solubilized species being regarded as distributed between a micellar phase and an bulk aqueous phase. with the micellar phase playing the same role as the organic solvent in ordinary liquid-liquid extraction. Water-insoluble metal chelates are made soluble in micellar solutions of nonionic surfactants. When the two phases can be separated physically, it should be possible to concentrate the metal chelates into a small volume of the micellar phase in a similar manner to ordinary liquid-liquid extraction. This can be carried out depending on the fact that a micellar solution of a nonionic surfactant separates into two phases above a certain temperature, defined as the cloud point. Polyoxyethylene nonyl phenyl ether . with on average 7.5 ethylene oxide units (PONPE-7.5), was used . The cloud point of a dilute micellar solution of PONPE-7.5 is 10, and hence the solution is turbid at room temperature, The two phases are readily separated by centrifuging. The zinc chelate of 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphthol was quantitatively extracted from 80 g of the solution into a small volume (1.3 ml) of the lower phase rich in PONPE-7.5. Nonionic surfactants will be useful as a new solvent for liquid-liquid extraction of metal ions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Watanabe, H. (1982). Nonionic Surfactants in Photometric Determination of Trace Metals. In Solution Behavior of Surfactants (pp. 1305–1313). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3494-1_38

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free