Comparison of two multi-trait association testing methods and sequence-based fine mapping of six additive QTL in Swiss Large White pigs

2Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Genetic correlations between complex traits suggest that pleiotropic variants contribute to trait variation. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) aim to uncover the genetic underpinnings of traits. Multivariate association testing and the meta-analysis of summary statistics from single-trait GWAS enable detecting variants associated with multiple phenotypes. In this study, we used array-derived genotypes and phenotypes for 24 reproduction, production, and conformation traits to explore differences between the two methods and used imputed sequence variant genotypes to fine-map six quantitative trait loci (QTL). Results: We considered genotypes at 44,733 SNPs for 5,753 pigs from the Swiss Large White breed that had deregressed breeding values for 24 traits. Single-trait association analyses revealed eleven QTL that affected 15 traits. Multi-trait association testing and the meta-analysis of the single-trait GWAS revealed between 3 and 6 QTL, respectively, in three groups of traits. The multi-trait methods revealed three loci that were not detected in the single-trait GWAS. Four QTL that were identified in the single-trait GWAS, remained undetected in the multi-trait analyses. To pinpoint candidate causal variants for the QTL, we imputed the array-derived genotypes to the sequence level using a sequenced reference panel consisting of 421 pigs. This approach provided genotypes at 16 million imputed sequence variants with a mean accuracy of imputation of 0.94. The fine-mapping of six QTL with imputed sequence variant genotypes revealed four previously proposed causal mutations among the top variants. Conclusions: Our findings in a medium-size cohort of pigs suggest that multivariate association testing and the meta-analysis of summary statistics from single-trait GWAS provide very similar results. Although multi-trait association methods provide a useful overview of pleiotropic loci segregating in mapping populations, the investigation of single-trait association studies is still advised, as multi-trait methods may miss QTL that are uncovered in single-trait GWAS.

References Powered by Scopus

Fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor

13813Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data

8306Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Second-generation PLINK: Rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets

7136Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Genome-Wide Association Study Meta-Analysis Elucidates Genetic Structure and Identifies Candidate Genes of Teat Number Traits in Pigs

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Unravelling novel and pleiotropic genes for cannon bone circumference and bone mineral density inYorkshire pigs

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nosková, A., Mehrotra, A., Kadri, N. K., Lloret-Villas, A., Neuenschwander, S., Hofer, A., & Pausch, H. (2023). Comparison of two multi-trait association testing methods and sequence-based fine mapping of six additive QTL in Swiss Large White pigs. BMC Genomics, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09295-4

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘2501234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

67%

Researcher 2

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

50%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

25%

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 1

13%

Environmental Science 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0