Influence of resection margin on survival in hepatic resections for colorectal liver metastases

35Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Traditionally a 1-cm margin has been accepted as the gold standard for resection of colorectal liver metastases. Evidence is emerging that a lesser margin may provide equally acceptable outcomes, but a critical margin, below which recurrence is higher and survival poorer, has not been universally agreed. In a recent publication, we reported peri-operative morbidity and clear margin as the two independent prognostic factors. The aim of the current study was to further analyse the effect of the width of the surgical margin on patient survival to determine whether a margin of 1 mm is adequate. Methods: Two hundred and sixty-one consecutive primary liver resections for colorectal metastases were analysed from 1992 to 2007. The resection margins were assessed by microscopic examination of paraffin sections. The initial analysis was performed on five groups according to the resection margins: involved margin, 0-1 mm, >1-<4 mm, 4-<10 mm and ≥ 10 mm. Subsequent analysis was based on two groups: margin <1 mm and >1 mm. Results: With a median follow-up of 4.7 years, the overall 5-year patient and disease-free survival were 38% and 22%, respectively. There was no significant difference in patient- or disease-free survival between the three groups with resection margins >1 mm. When a comparison was made between patients with resection margins ≤1 mm and patients with resection margins >1 mm, there was a significant 5-year patient survival difference of 25% versus 43% (P < 0.04). However, the disease-free survival difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.14). Conclusions: In this cohort of patients, we have demonstrated that a resection margin of greater than 1 mm is associated with significantly improved 5-year overall survival, compared with involved margins or margins less than or equal to 1 mm. The possible beneficial effect of greater margins beyond 1 mm could not be demonstrated. © 2009 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vandeweyer, D., Neo, E. L., Chen, J. W. C., Maddern, G. J., Wilson, T. G., & Padbury, R. T. A. (2009). Influence of resection margin on survival in hepatic resections for colorectal liver metastases. HPB, 11(6), 499–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00092.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free