Metabolic Effects of Selected Conventional and Alternative Sweeteners: A Narrative Review

2Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Sugar consumption is known to be associated with a whole range of adverse health effects, including overweight status and type II diabetes mellitus. In 2015, the World Health Organization issued a guideline recommending the reduction of sugar intake. In this context, alternative sweeteners have gained interest as sugar substitutes to achieve this goal without loss of the sweet taste. This review aims to provide an overview of the scientific literature and establish a reference tool for selected conventional sweeteners (sucrose, glucose, and fructose) and alternative sweeteners (sucralose, xylitol, erythritol, and D-allulose), specifically focusing on their important metabolic effects. The results show that alternative sweeteners constitute a diverse group, and each substance exhibits one or more metabolic effects. Therefore, no sweetener can be considered to be inert. Additionally, xylitol, erythritol, and D-allulose seem promising as alternative sweeteners due to favorable metabolic outcomes. These alternative sweeteners replicate the benefits of sugars (e.g., sweetness and gastrointestinal hormone release) while circumventing the detrimental effects of these substances on human health.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Teysseire, F., Bordier, V., Beglinger, C., Wölnerhanssen, B. K., & Meyer-Gerspach, A. C. (2024, March 1). Metabolic Effects of Selected Conventional and Alternative Sweeteners: A Narrative Review. Nutrients. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16050622

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free