Time-space tradeoffs for satisfiability

44Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We give the first nontrivial model-independent time-space tradeoffs for satisfiability. Namely, we show that SAT̄ cannot be solved in n1+o(1) time and n1-ε space for any ε>0 general random-access nondeterministic Turing machines. In particular, SAT cannot be solved deterministically by a Turing machine using quasilinear time and √n space. We also give lower bounds for log-space uniform NC1 circuits and branching programs. Our proof uses two basic ideas. First we show that if SAT̄ can be solved nondeterministically with a small amount of time then we can collapse a nonconstant number of levels of the polynomial-time hierarchy. We combine this work with a result of Nepomnjascii that shows that a nondeterministic computation of super-linear time and sublinear space can be simulated in alternating linear time. A simple diagonalization yields our main result. We discuss how these bounds lead to a new approach to separating the complexity classes NL and NP. We give some possibilities and limitations of this approach.

References Powered by Scopus

The complexity of theorem-proving procedures

4129Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Alternation

1318Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Relationships between nondeterministic and deterministic tape complexities

998Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Uniform constant-depth threshold circuits for division and iterated multiplication

150Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Proving lower bounds via pseudo-random generators

113Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Amplifying lower bounds by means of self-reducibility

69Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fortnow, L. (2000). Time-space tradeoffs for satisfiability. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 60(2), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.1999.1671

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

44%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

33%

Researcher 2

22%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 9

100%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free