No training required: Experimental tests support homology-based DNA assembly as a best practice in synthetic biology

6Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The Registry of Standard Biological Parts imposes sequence constraints to enable DNA assembly using restriction enzymes. Alnahhas et al. (Journal of Biological Engineering 2014, 8:28) recently argued that these constraints should be revised because they impose an unnecessary burden on contributors that use homology-based assembly. To add to this debate, we tested four different homology-based methods, and found that students using these methods on their first attempt have a high probability of success. Because of their ease of use and high success rates, we believe that homology-based assembly is a best practice of Synthetic Biology, and recommend that the Registry implement the changes proposed by Alnahhas et al. to better support their use.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Azizi, A., Lam, W., Phenix, H., Tepliakova, L., Roney, I. J., Jedrysiak, D., … Kærn, M. (2015, June 12). No training required: Experimental tests support homology-based DNA assembly as a best practice in synthetic biology. Journal of Biological Engineering. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-015-0006-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free