Modification of the Johnson–Cook Material Model for Improved Simulation of Hard Milling High-Performance Steel Components

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Understanding the effect of thermomechanical loads during finish cutting processes, in our case hard milling, on the surface integrity of the workpiece is crucial for the creation of defined quality characteristics of high-performance components. Compared to computationally generated modifications by simulation, the measurement-based determination of material modifications can only be carried out selectively and on a point-by-point basis. In practice, however, detailed knowledge of the changes in material properties at arbitrary points of the high-performance component is of great interest. In this paper, a modification of the well-known Johnson–Cook material model using the finite element software Abaqus is presented. Special attention was paid to the kinematic hardening behavior of the used steel material. Cyclic loads are relevant for the chip formation simulation because, during milling, after each cut, the material under the surface is loaded plastically several times and not necessarily in the same direction. Therefore, in analogy, multiple bending was investigated on samples made of 42CrMo4. A pronounced Bauschinger effect was observed in the bending tests. An adaptation of the material model to the results of the bending tests was only possible to a limited extent without kinematic hardening, which is why the Johnson–Cook model was supplemented by the Armstrong–Frederick hardening approach. The modified Johnson–Cook–Armstrong–Frederick material model was developed for practical use as a VUMAT and verified by bending tests for simulation use.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vovk, A., Pourkaveh Dehkordi, A., Glüge, R., Karpuschewski, B., & Sölter, J. (2021). Modification of the Johnson–Cook Material Model for Improved Simulation of Hard Milling High-Performance Steel Components. Applied Mechanics, 2(3), 571–580. https://doi.org/10.3390/applmech2030032

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free