Z-score-based modularity for community detection in networks

31Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Identifying community structure in networks is an issue of particular interest in network science. The modularity introduced by Newman and Girvan is the most popular quality function for community detection in networks. In this study, we identify a problem in the concept of modularity and suggest a solution to overcome this problem. Specifically, we obtain a new quality function for community detection. We refer to the function as Z-modularity because it measures the Z-score of a given partition with respect to the fraction of the number of edges within communities. Our theoretical analysis shows that Z-modularity mitigates the resolution limit of the original modularity in certain cases. Computational experiments using both artificial networks and well-known real-world networks demonstrate the validity and reliability of the proposed quality function.

References Powered by Scopus

Fast unfolding of communities in large networks

15007Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The structure and function of complex networks

14423Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Community structure in social and biological networks

12497Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

CDLIB: a python library to extract, compare and evaluate communities from complex networks

98Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Community structure: A comparative evaluation of community detection methods

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evolution of communities in dynamic social networks: An efficient map-based approach

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miyauchi, A., & Kawase, Y. (2016). Z-score-based modularity for community detection in networks. PLoS ONE, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147805

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 24

63%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

11%

Researcher 4

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 20

67%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

13%

Social Sciences 3

10%

Mathematics 3

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free