Corneal confocal microscopy is efficient, well-tolerated, and reproducible.

24Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In order to develop an efficient, reproducible, and well-tolerated protocol for assessing corneal innervation, 11 normal subjects underwent corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) using a Heidelberg Retinal Tomography III microscope. Five standardized locations were sampled in the left eye and one centrally in the right. The protocol was repeated 1-4 weeks later. A blinded technician measured nerve fiber length (NFL) and tortuosity coefficient (TC). The relationship between image location and NFL and TC was assessed using one-way analysis of variance, and reproducibility determined using relative intertrial variability and intraclass correlation coefficients. NFL reproducibility was maximized by averaging four or more images from the left eye, or one central image from both eyes. TC was less reproducible. CCM is a rapid, well-tolerated, and reproducible method for assessing corneal innervation. © 2013 Peripheral Nerve Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, A. G., Kim, G., Porzio, M., Allen, B., Koach, M., Mifflin, M., … Singleton, J. R. (2013). Corneal confocal microscopy is efficient, well-tolerated, and reproducible. Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System : JPNS, 18(1), 54–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/jns5.12008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free