Critical evaluation of a commercial enzyme kit (Sigma) for determining oxalate concentrations in urine

22Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Sigma reagent kit for urinary oxalate determination is reportedly simple, rapid, and specific for oxalate. We evaluated the kit and identified a number of shortcomings. Our investigations suggest that the recommended time for chromophore development is too short and should be doubled. Oxalate recovery during the extraction procedure depends strongly on urine pH. For complete extraction, urine should be acidified to pH 1.8-2.4. We also observed positive interference from ascorbate in urine. This interference was substantial, absorbances produced from ascorbate standards being approximately 80% of those obtained from oxalate standards of similar concentration. Our investigations also indicate the presence of a substance on the Sigma adsorbent that is eluted during the extraction procedure and interferes in the color reaction. These interferences represent potentially major sources of imprecision in the assay.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Hybrid nickel hexacyanoferrate/polypyrrole composite as mediator for hydrogen peroxide detection and its application in oxidase-based biosensors

87Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Catalytic spectrophotometric methods for the determination of oxalic acid

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evidence on manganese peroxidase and tyrosinase expression during decolorization of textile industry dyes by Trichosporon akiyoshidainum

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Parkinson, I. S., Sheldon, W. L., Laker, M. F., & Smith, P. A. (1987). Critical evaluation of a commercial enzyme kit (Sigma) for determining oxalate concentrations in urine. Clinical Chemistry, 33(7), 1203–1207. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/33.7.1203

Readers over time

‘14‘16‘17‘2400.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 1

33%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

33%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 1

25%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

25%

Engineering 1

25%

Immunology and Microbiology 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0