Interdependent Infrastructure as Linked Social, Ecological, and Technological Systems (SETSs) to Address Lock-in and Enhance Resilience

196Citations
Citations of this article
348Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Traditional infrastructure adaptation to extreme weather events (and now climate change) has typically been techno-centric and heavily grounded in robustness—the capacity to prevent or minimize disruptions via a risk-based approach that emphasizes control, armoring, and strengthening (e.g., raising the height of levees). However, climate and nonclimate challenges facing infrastructure are not purely technological. Ecological and social systems also warrant consideration to manage issues of overconfidence, inflexibility, interdependence, and resource utilization—among others. As a result, techno-centric adaptation strategies can result in unwanted tradeoffs, unintended consequences, and underaddressed vulnerabilities. Techno-centric strategies that lock-in today's infrastructure systems to vulnerable future design, management, and regulatory practices may be particularly problematic by exacerbating these ecological and social issues rather than ameliorating them. Given these challenges, we develop a conceptual model and infrastructure adaptation case studies to argue the following: (1) infrastructure systems are not simply technological and should be understood as complex and interconnected social, ecological, and technological systems (SETSs); (2) infrastructure challenges, like lock-in, stem from SETS interactions that are often overlooked and underappreciated; (3) framing infrastructure with a SETS lens can help identify and prevent maladaptive issues like lock-in; and (4) a SETS lens can also highlight effective infrastructure adaptation strategies that may not traditionally be considered. Ultimately, we find that treating infrastructure as SETS shows promise for increasing the adaptive capacity of infrastructure systems by highlighting how lock-in and vulnerabilities evolve and how multidisciplinary strategies can be deployed to address these challenges by broadening the options for adaptation.

References Powered by Scopus

Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses

5305Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Vulnerability

4458Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems

3912Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Nature-based approaches to managing climate change impacts in cities

265Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Artificial intelligence, systemic risks, and sustainability

231Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A social-ecological-technological systems framework for urban ecosystem services

161Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Markolf, S. A., Chester, M. V., Eisenberg, D. A., Iwaniec, D. M., Davidson, C. I., Zimmerman, R., … Chang, H. (2018). Interdependent Infrastructure as Linked Social, Ecological, and Technological Systems (SETSs) to Address Lock-in and Enhance Resilience. Earth’s Future, 6(12), 1638–1659. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF000926

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 123

62%

Researcher 42

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 20

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 14

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 60

38%

Engineering 56

35%

Social Sciences 31

20%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0