A latent variable model of synchronous parsing for syntactic and semantic dependencies

40Citations
Citations of this article
88Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We propose a solution to the challenge of the CoNLL 2008 shared task that uses a generative history-based latent variable model to predict the most likely derivation of a synchronous dependency parser for both syntactic and semantic dependencies. The submitted model yields 79.1% macroaverage F1 performance, for the joint task, 86.9% syntactic dependencies LAS and 71.0% semantic dependencies F1. A larger model trained after the deadline achieves 80.5% macro-average F1, 87.6% syntactic dependencies LAS, and 73.1% semantic dependencies F1. © 2008.

References Powered by Scopus

The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles

1675Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The CoNLL-2008 shared task on joint parsing of syntactic and semantic dependencies

387Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A latent variable model for generative dependency parsing

59Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Encoding sentences with graph convolutional networks for semantic role labeling

591Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The CoNLL-2008 shared task on joint parsing of syntactic and semantic dependencies

387Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Handbook of Computational Linguistics and Natural Language Processing

167Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Henderson, J., Merlo, P., Musillo, G., & Titov, I. (2008). A latent variable model of synchronous parsing for syntactic and semantic dependencies. In CoNLL 2008 - Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (pp. 178–182). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/1596324.1596354

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 31

57%

Researcher 12

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 39

74%

Linguistics 11

21%

Engineering 2

4%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free