Categories of Practice Transformation in a Statewide Medical Home Pilot and their Association with Medical Home Recognition

12Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthcare purchasers have created financial incentives for primary care practices to achieve medical home recognition. Little is known about how changes in practice structure vary across practices or relate to medical home recognition. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize patterns of structural change among primary care practices participating in a statewide medical home pilot. DESIGN: We surveyed practices at baseline and year 3 of the pilot, measured associations between changes in structural capabilities and National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) medical home recognition levels, and used latent class analysis to identify distinct classes of structural transformation. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-one practices that completed surveys at baseline and year 3 participated in the study. MAIN MEASURES: Study measures included overall structural capability score (mean of 69 capabilities); eight structural subscale scores; and NCQA recognition levels. RESULTS: Practices achieving higher year-3 NCQA recognition levels had higher overall structural capability scores at baseline (Level 1: 28.4 % of surveyed capabilities, Level 2: 40.9 %, Level 3: 48.7 %; p value = 0.001). We found no association between NCQA recognition level and change in structural capability scores (Level 1: 33.2 % increase, Level 2: 30.8 %, Level 3: 33.7 %; p value = 0.88). There were four classes of practice transformation: 27 % of practices underwent “minimal” transformation (changing little on any scale); 20 % underwent “provider-facing” transformation (adopting electronic health records, patient registries, and care reminders); 26 % underwent “patient-facing” transformation (adopting shared systems for communicating with patients, care managers, referral to community resources, and after-hours care); and 26 % underwent “broad” transformation (highest or second-highest levels of transformation on each subscale). Conclusions and Relevance: In a large, state-based medical home pilot, multiple types of practice transformation could be distinguished, and higher levels of medical home recognition were associated with practices’ capabilities at baseline, rather than transformation over time. By identifying and explicitly incentivizing the most effective types of transformation, program designers may improve the effectiveness of medical home interventions.

References Powered by Scopus

Early experience with pay-for-performance: From concept to practice

564Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Association between participation in a multipayer medical home intervention and changes in quality, utilization, and costs of care

283Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A nationwide survey of patient centered medical home demonstration projects

200Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Shifting implementation science theory to empower primary care practices

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Linking structural capabilities and workplace climate in community health centers

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Association between Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA) Status, Work Environment, and Nurse Practitioner Burnout and Job Dissatisfaction

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martsolf, G. R., Kandrack, R., Schneider, E. C., & Friedberg, M. W. (2015). Categories of Practice Transformation in a Statewide Medical Home Pilot and their Association with Medical Home Recognition. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 30(6), 817–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3176-3

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

71%

Researcher 5

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

43%

Social Sciences 6

26%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

22%

Psychology 2

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free