A cohort review approach evaluating community health worker programs in New York City, 2015-2017

4Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe how a cohort review approach was applied as an evaluation framework for a community health worker intervention among adult residents in 5 public housing developments in New York City in 2015-2017. The cohort review approach involved systematically monitoring participants engaged in the Harlem Health Advocacy Partners program during a given time period ("cohort") to assess individual outcomes and program performance. We monitored participation status (completed, still active, disengaged, on leave, or died) and health outcomes. In this example of a cohort review, levels of enrollment and program disengagement were higher in cohort 1 than in cohort 2. For 6-month health outcomes, the percentage of participants with hypertension who had controlled blood pressure was static in cohort 1 and improved significantly in cohort 2. The percentage of participants with diabetes who self-reported controlled hemoglobin A1c increased significantly in cohort 1 at 6-month follow- up. The cohort approach highlighted important outcome successes and identified workload challenges affecting recruitment and retention.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Feinberg, A., Seidl, L., Dannefer, R., Wyka, K., Drackett, E., Brown-Dudley, L., … Thorpe, L. E. (2019). A cohort review approach evaluating community health worker programs in New York City, 2015-2017. Preventing Chronic Disease, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd16.180623

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free