A national survey of the hospital services for the management of adult deliberate self-harm

19Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims and method: Services were compared for the management of deliberate self-harm with existing national guidance. A postal survey was sent to all clinical directors of adult psychiatry at all NHS trusts assessing adult patients admitted to general hospital following deliberate self-harm in England. Results: Responses were received from 129 (65%) trusts. Thirty per cent of trusts do not use secondary psychiatric services for psycho-social assessment following deliberate self-harm; 52% have designated self-harm liaison staff and 69% of general hospitals have a ward to which most cases of deliberate self-harm are admitted. However, only 18% have staff with psychiatric experience. In 82% of trusts training is provided for junior psychiatrists at induction but in only 56% are observed-assessment undertaken. Forty-two per cent of the trusts have a deliberate self-harm services planning group. Clinical Implications: Standards for deliberate self-harm services fall substantially below existing national guidelines, particularly in the areas of planning and training.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Slinn, R., King, A., & Evans, J. (2001). A national survey of the hospital services for the management of adult deliberate self-harm. Psychiatric Bulletin, 25(2), 53–55. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.25.2.53

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free