Interoperability of laboratory data in Switzerland - A spotlight on Bern

12Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Laboratory data is a treasure chest for personalized medicine: it is - in general - electronically available, highly structured, quality controlled and indicative for many diseases. However, it is also a box with (probably more than) seven locks: laboratories use their own internal coding systems, results are reported in different languages (four official languages plus English with very distinct features in Switzerland), report formats are not uniform, standard nomenclature (e.g. Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes [LOINC]) is not routinely used and even these coding systems lack important information, including data, for example, about the specific "kit"used for testing or preanalytical procedures affecting the sample quality and result interpretability. Visualization of complex laboratory and reporting "-omics"data are additional challenges. Currently, there is no "passepartout"key for all these locks available, and also newer concepts such as Fast Health Interoperability Resources (FHIR) might not provide enough plasticity to unconditionally render laboratory data interoperable. In this short overview, we present current approaches in Switzerland with a specific focus on the exemplary Bernese implementations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dahlweid, F. M., Kämpf, M., & Leichtle, A. (2018, December 1). Interoperability of laboratory data in Switzerland - A spotlight on Bern. Journal of Laboratory Medicine. Walter de Gruyter GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2018-0072

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free