There is extensive literature debating whether perceived size is used to guide grasping. A possible reason for not using judged size is that using judged positions might lead to more precise movements. As this argument does not hold for small objects and all studies showing an effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping used small objects, we hypothesized that size information is used for small objects but not for large ones. Using a modified diagonal illusion, we obtained an effect of about 10% on perceptual judgements, without an effect on grasping, irrespective of object size. We therefore reject our precision hypothesis. We discuss the results in the framework of grasping as moving digits to positions on an object. We conclude that the reported disagreement on the effect of illusions is because the Ebbinghaus illusion not only affects size, but—unlike most size illusions—also affects perceived positions.
CITATION STYLE
Smeets, J. B. J., Kleijn, E., van der Meijden, M., & Brenner, E. (2020). Why some size illusions affect grip aperture. Experimental Brain Research, 238(4), 969–979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05775-1
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.