Efficiency Wages Reconsidered: Theory and Evidence

  • Murphy K
  • Topel R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

(No abstract) Differences in wages for observationally similar persons have interested economists at least since Smith, who devoted a chapter (I.X) to the problem. Smith identified five sources of wage inequality, of which the fourth is the ‘small or great trust which must be reposed in the workmen’. He argued that workers in jobs requiring greater trust (goldsmiths and jewellers were his examples) receive higher wages than ‘those of other workmen, not only of equal, but of much superior ingenuity’. Smith clearly envisioned that a type of agency problem was solved by paying higher wages, for he notes that this source of wage inequality is internalized ‘when a person employs his own stock in trade’.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Murphy, K. M., & Topel, R. H. (1990). Efficiency Wages Reconsidered: Theory and Evidence. In Advances in the Theory and Measurement of Unemployment (pp. 204–240). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10688-2_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free