Protective effects of quercetin against chronic mixed reflux esophagitis in rats by inhibiting the nuclear factor-κB p65 and interleukin-8 signaling pathways

8Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To observe the effects of quercetin on chronic mixed reflux esophagitis (RE) in rats by inhibiting the nuclear factor-κB p65 (NF-κBp65) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) signaling pathways. Methods: Forty-eight healthy male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into six groups, with 8 rats in each group: the normal intact group, the sham operation group, the RE control group, the RE group treated with omeprazole or 100mg/kg and 200mg/kg quercetin. The animals were sacrificed after 6 weeks of different interventions. The pathological characteristics of esophageal mucosa were observed according to the diagnostic criteria and the expressions of NF-κBp65 and IL-8 were assessed by immunohistochemistry and real-time polymerase chain reaction. Results: Compared with the RE control group, esophageal mucosal injury was improved and the expressions of NF-κBp65 and IL-8 were significantly decreased in the RE group treated with omeprazole or quercetin (P<0.05). Compared with the omeprazole group, the gross and microscopic scores of esophageal mucosal injury and the expressions of NF-κBp65 and IL-8 in the 100mg/kg and 200mg/kg quercetin groups were not increased (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the RE groups treated with 100mg/kg quercetin and 200mg/kg quercetin. Conclusion: Quercetin can prevent esophageal mucosal injury in RE rats by suppressing the NF-κBp65 and IL- 8 signaling pathways.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wu, P., Zhou, L., Li, Y. J., Luo, B., Yi, L. S., Chen, S. F., … Xu, S. C. (2015). Protective effects of quercetin against chronic mixed reflux esophagitis in rats by inhibiting the nuclear factor-κB p65 and interleukin-8 signaling pathways. Journal of Digestive Diseases, 16(6), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-2980.12249

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free