Cystatin C versus Creatinine in Determining Risk Based on Kidney Function

  • Shlipak M
  • Matsushita K
  • Ärnlöv J
  • et al.
727Citations
Citations of this article
618Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Adding the measurement of cystatin C to that of serum creatinine to determine the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) improves accuracy, but the effect on detection, staging, and risk classification of chronic kidney disease across diverse populations has not been determined. METHODS We performed a meta-analysis of 11 general-population studies (with 90,750 participants) and 5 studies of cohorts with chronic kidney disease (2960 participants) for whom standardized measurements of serum creatinine and cystatin C were available. We compared the association of the eGFR, as calculated by the measurement of creatinine or cystatin C alone or in combination with creatinine, with the rates of death (13,202 deaths in 15 cohorts), death from cardiovascular causes (3471 in 12 cohorts), and end-stage renal disease (1654 cases in 7 cohorts) and assessed improvement in reclassification with the use of cystatin C. RESULTS In the general-population cohorts, the prevalence of an eGFR of less than 60 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) of body-surface area was higher with the cystatin C-based eGFR than with the creatinine-based eGFR (13.7% vs. 9.7%). Across all eGFR categories, the reclassification of the eGFR to a higher value with the measurement of cystatin C, as compared with creatinine, was associated with a reduced risk of all three study outcomes, and reclassification to a lower eGFR was associated with an increased risk. The net reclassification improvement with the measurement of cystatin C, as compared with creatinine, was 0.23 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 0.28) for death and 0.10 (95% CI, 0.00 to 0.21) for end-stage renal disease. Results were generally similar for the five cohorts with chronic kidney disease and when both creatinine and cystatin C were used to calculate the eGFR. CONCLUSIONS The use of cystatin C alone or in combination with creatinine strengthens the association between the eGFR and the risks of death and end-stage renal disease across diverse populations. (Funded by the National Kidney Foundation and others.).

References Powered by Scopus

A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate

20726Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond

5323Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis

3441Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics'2017 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association

7467Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2018 update: A report from the American Heart Association

5721Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice

5651Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shlipak, M. G., Matsushita, K., Ärnlöv, J., Inker, L. A., Katz, R., Polkinghorne, K. R., … Gansevoort, R. T. (2013). Cystatin C versus Creatinine in Determining Risk Based on Kidney Function. New England Journal of Medicine, 369(10), 932–943. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1214234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 197

56%

Researcher 80

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 60

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 16

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 295

79%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31

8%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 31

8%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 17

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 4
References: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free