Handling stress may confound murine gut microbiota studies

19Citations
Citations of this article
107Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background. Accumulating evidence indicates interactions between human milk composition, particularly sugars (human milk oligosaccharides or HMO), the gut microbiota of human infants, and behavioral effects. Some HMO secreted in human milk are unable to be endogenously digested by the human infant but are able to be metabolized by certain species of gut microbiota, including Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis (B. infantis), a species sensitive to host stress (Bailey & Coe, 2004). Expo- sure to gut bacteria like B. infantis during critical neurodevelopment windows in early life appears to have behavioral consequences; however, environmental, physical, and social stress during this period can also have behavioral and microbial consequences. While rodent models are a useful method for determining causal relationships between HMO, gut microbiota, and behavior, murine studies of gut microbiota usually employ oral gavage, a technique stressful to the mouse. Our aim was to develop a less-invasive technique for HMO administration to remove the potential confound of gavage stress. Under the hypothesis that stress affects gut microbiota, particularly B. infantis, we predicted the pups receiving a prebiotic solution in a less-invasive manner would have the highest amount of Bifidobacteria in their gut. Methods. This study was designed to test two methods, active and passive, of solution administration to mice and the effects on their gut microbiome. Neonatal C57BL/6J mice housed in a specific-pathogen free facility received increasing doses of fructooligosaccharide (FOS) solution or deionized, distilled water. Gastrointestinal (GI) tracts were collected from five dams, six sires, and 41 pups over four time points. Seven fecal pellets from unhandled pups and two pellets from unhandled dams were also collected. Qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to quantify and compare the amount of Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes. Results. Our results demonstrate a significant difference between the amount of Firmicutes in pups receiving water passively and those receiving FOS actively (p-value = 0.009). Additionally, we found significant differences between the fecal microbiota from handled and non-handled mouse pups. Discussion. From our results, we conclude even handling pups for experimental purposes, without gavage, may induce enough stress to alter the murine gut microbiota profile. We suggest further studies to examine potential stress effects on gut microbiota caused by experimental techniques. Stress from experimental techniques may need to be accounted for in future gut microbiota studies.

References Powered by Scopus

An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest

9829Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography

5961Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns

3647Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Interactions between Intestinal microbiota and host immune response in inflammatory bowel disease

257Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Foodborne Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles Induce Stronger Adverse Effects in Obese Mice than Non-Obese Mice: Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis, Colonic Inflammation, and Proteome Alterations

102Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The changes of gut microbiota after acute myocardial infarction in rats

66Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Allen-Blevins, C. R., You, X., Hinde, K., & Sela, D. A. (2017). Handling stress may confound murine gut microbiota studies. PeerJ, 2017(1). https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2876

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 36

57%

Researcher 20

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21

40%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 12

23%

Neuroscience 10

19%

Immunology and Microbiology 10

19%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 466

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0