Renal Denervation vs Pharmacotherapy for Resistant Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis

7Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The effect of renal denervation (RD) for resistant hypertension remains controversial because of the conflicting results of finished and ongoing studies. The authors performed a meta-analysis of case-control studies to identify whether renal sympathetic denervation or pharmacotherapy (PHAR) was more effective for resistant hypertension. A systematic Internet database search of relevant papers written in English was performed. A total of nine studies met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 1096 patients. When comparing the RD group with the PHAR group, there was a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (weighted mean difference, −12.81 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval [CI], −22.77 mm Hg to −2.85 mm Hg; P=.01) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (weighted mean difference, −5.56; 95% CI, −8.15 mm Hg to −2.97 mm Hg; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sun, D., Li, C., Li, M., Liu, J., & Wen, S. (2016). Renal Denervation vs Pharmacotherapy for Resistant Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Hypertension, 18(8), 733–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.12742

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free