National survey of Australian cardiac rehabilitation programmes: does current exercise programming adhere to evidence-based guidelines and best practice?

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives The efficacy of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for patient outcomes is well established, with better outcomes when delivery meets recommended guidelines. The aim of this study was to assess how well Australian practice aligns with national CR guidelines for exercise assessment and prescription. Method This cross-sectional online survey was distributed to all 475 publicly listed CR services in Australia and consisted of four sections: (1) Programme and client demographics, (2) aerobic exercise characteristics, (3) resistance exercise characteristics and (4) pre-exercise assessment, exercise testing and progression. Results In total, 228 (54%) survey responses were received. Only three of five Australian guideline recommendations were consistently reported to be followed in current CR programmes: assessment of physical function prior to exercise (91%), prescription of light-moderate exercise intensity (76%) and review of referring physician results (75%). Remaining guidelines were commonly not implemented. For example, only 58% of services reported an initial assessment of resting ECG/heart rate, and only 58% reported the concurrent prescription of both aerobic and resistance exercise, which may have been influenced by equipment availability (p<0.05). Exercise-specific assessments such as muscular strength (18%) and aerobic fitness (13%) were uncommonly reported, although both were more frequent in metropolitan services (p<0.05) or when an exercise physiologist was present (p<0.05). Conclusions Clinically relevant deficits in national CR guideline implementation are common, potentially influenced by location, exercise supervisor and equipment availability. Key deficiencies include the lack of concurrent aerobic and resistance exercise prescription and infrequent assessment of important physiological outcomes including resting heart rate, muscular strength and aerobic fitness.

References Powered by Scopus

Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: Guidance for prescribing exercise

7127Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Progressive resistance strength training for improving physical function in older adults

972Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update - A sci. statement from the Am. Heart Assoc. exercise, cardiac rehabilitation, and prevention comm., the council on clinical cardiology; the councils on cardiovascular nursing, epidemiology and prevention, and nutrition, physical activity, and metabolism; and the Am. Assoc. of Cardiovasc. and Pulmonary Rehabil.

925Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Stakeholder perceptions of factors contributing to effective implementation of exercise cardiac telerehabilitation in clinical practice

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hollings, M., Mavros, Y., Freeston, J., & Singh, M. F. (2023). National survey of Australian cardiac rehabilitation programmes: does current exercise programming adhere to evidence-based guidelines and best practice? BMJ Open Sport and Exercise Medicine, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001468

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

33%

Social Sciences 2

33%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

17%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0