Knowledge

0Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Serious argumentation is not about opinions but about gaining orientation in new realms of reality. From a pragmatic point of view, orientation is the function of theory. In order to develop this view, the pragmatist and neopragmatist philosophy is critically examined. A concept of successful praxis is established as a basis of theoretical understanding. The growth of understanding is modeled as a differentiation of the theory concept into epistemic (old) and thetic (new) theory. Based on this, extensive conceptual clarifications of knowledge and truth are carried out with regard to the role of argument and via the critical examination of the respective work in analytical philosophy (e.g. the Gettier problem).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wohlrapp, H. R. (2014). Knowledge. In Logic, Argumentation and Reasoning (Vol. 4, pp. 1–54). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8762-8_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free