A comparison of minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy and traditional parathyroidectomy for parathyroid adenoma

22Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Pre-operative imaging techniques for sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism (SPHPT) and intraoperative parathyroid hormone (ioPTH) have led to the wide spread use of minimally invasive surgical approaches. Study Design: In our prospectively collected database, 157 subjects with SPHPT and a preoperative diagnosis of parathyroid adenoma were treated with parathyroidectomy between January 2003 and November 2011. Subjects in group A were enrolled between January 2003 to September 2006, and underwent traditional parathyroidectomy with intraoperative frozen section and bilateral neck exploration. Subjects in group B were enrolled between September 2006 to November 2011, and underwent minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) with ioPTH. Operative times and post-operative pain levels were compared between groups. Subjects were followed for a minimum of 6 months post-operatively and recurrence rates and complication rates were measured between groups. Results: 81 subjects were enrolled in group A, and 76 subjects were enrolled in group B. Pre-operative evaluation demonstrated that the groups were statistically similar. Significantly decreased operative times (28min vs. 62min) and post-operative pain levels were noted in group B. Recurrence rates were similar between group A (3.7%) and group B (2.6%). Conclusions: MIVAP with ioPTH demonstrated significantly improved operative times and post-operative pain levels, while maintaining equivalent recurrence rates. © Ivyspring International Publisher.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rio, P. D., Vicente, D., Maestroni, U., Totaro, A., Casoni Pattacini, G. M., Avital, I., … Sianesi, M. (2013). A comparison of minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy and traditional parathyroidectomy for parathyroid adenoma. Journal of Cancer, 4(6), 458–463. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.6755

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free