Over-expression of glycerol dehydrogenase and1,3-propanediol oxidoreductase in Klebsiella pneumoniae and their effects on conversion of glycerol into 1,3-propanediol in resting cell system

19Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Glycerol dehydrogenase [EC.1.1.1.6] and 1,3-propanediol oxidoreductase [EC.1.1.1.202] were proved to be two of the key enzymes for glycerol conversion to 1,3-propanediol in Klebsiella pneumoniae under anaerobic conditions. For insight into their significance on 1,3-propanediol production under micro-aerobic conditions, these two enzymeswere over-expressed in K. pneumoniae individually, and their effects on conversion of glycerol into 1,3-propanediol in a resting cell system under micro-aerobic conditions were investigated. Results: In the resting cell system, over-expression of 1,3-propanediol oxidoreductase led to faster glycerol conversion and 1,3-propanediol production. After a 12 h conversion process, it improved the yield of 1,3-propanediol by 20.4% (222.1 mmol L-1 versus 184.4 mmol L-1) and enhanced the conversion ratio of glycerol into 1,3-propanediol from 50.8% to 59.8% (mol mol-1). Over-expression of glycerol dehydrogenase in K. pneumoniae had no significant influence both on 1,3-propanediol yield and on the conversion ratio of glycerol into 1,3-propanediol in the resting cell system. Conclusion: The results were important for an understanding of the significance of glycerol dehydrogenase and 1,3-propanediol oxidoreductase in 1,3-proanediol production under micro-aerobic conditions, and for developing better strategies to improve 1,3-propanediol yield. © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhao, L., Ma, X., Zheng, Y., Zhang, J., Wei, G., & Wei, D. (2009). Over-expression of glycerol dehydrogenase and1,3-propanediol oxidoreductase in Klebsiella pneumoniae and their effects on conversion of glycerol into 1,3-propanediol in resting cell system. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 84(4), 626–632. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2092

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free