Did a Switch in Time Save Nine?

  • Ho D
  • Quinn K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Franklin Delano Roosevelt's court-packing plan of 1937 and the "switch in time that saved nine" animate central questions of law, politics, and history. Did Supreme Court Justice Roberts abruptly switch votes in 1937 to avert a showdown with Roosevelt? Scholars disagree vigorously about whether Roberts's transformation was gradual and anticipated or abrupt and unexpected. Using newly collected data of votes from the 1931-1940 terms, we contribute to the historical understanding of this episode by providing the fi rst quantitative evidence of Roberts's transformation. Applying modern measurement methods, we show that Roberts shifted sharply to the left in the 1936 term. The shift appears sudden and temporary. The duration of Roberts's shift, however, is in many ways irrelevant, as the long-term transformation of the Court is overwhelmingly attributable to Roosevelt's appointees.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ho, D. E., & Quinn, K. M. (2010). Did a Switch in Time Save Nine? Journal of Legal Analysis, 2(1), 69–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/2.1.69

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

63%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

25%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 4

50%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

25%

Materials Science 1

13%

Computer Science 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free